Sea Trebuchets...

It is a widely accepted fact that Aramon Trebuchets are broken, thus being discouraged in most games. However, the poor sea treb is always gets lumped with its more notorious older brother, as if it was as powerful.

It's more the other units that get paired with trebs that make it so imbalanced. Acolytes, Titans, Gates, Strongholds, Mage Archers etc. There is no such equivalent on water however, making Sea Trebs a lot easier to kill.

Depending on the match up, Trebuchets on the sea should be allowed IMO.

Aramon vs Sea Treb: Prohibiting both trebs here makes sense. Its very difficult from either to kill eachothers trebuchets with anything else but trebuchets.

Taros vs Sea Treb: Difficult but not impossible

Zhon vs Sea Treb There is no excuse here. You have rocs + swamp beasts and Drakes + Gryphons.

Creon vs Sea Treb Neo Dragons and Ironclads, and both have enough hit points to easily survive a wave. Shouldn't be too difficult.

by my expirience, they are "more" "allowed" than aramon treb

specially vs zhon,creon,taros; due to fact, that they can wreck that expensive thing quite easly

but its all depends on map

$ MalinOMW wrote:

but its all depends on map

Yeah I agree. Small enclosed ponds like in bloods might be easier to defend with crossbowmen and other land based AA

It's just the attitude some players have towards it, especially on maps where its SO obvious that they can counter it with a simple drop or airstrike with little resistance. Dragons from all races can be effective treb hunters as well.

Also like you said earlier, sea trebs are fairly expensive and hard to replace anyway.